Posts Tagged ‘San Diego SEO’

Image Search Engines

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

by Jonathan Marshall

Today there are major search engines that offer advanced search options based on image, this allows users to filter searches by size, colorization, and file type. Even with this evolution of search technology, there are still limiting issues. According to Julie Batten from ClickZ, until recently, most search engines had focused on alt tags and context surrounding images to categorize and index those images. A user would type in a text query, and the search engine would rank the images based almost exclusively on their relevancy to the keywords contained in the image’s alt text, surrounding body copy, and page metadata. Unfortunately, this has made image search the target of spammers undertaking keyword stuffing or similar black-hat SEO techniques. Batten goes on to talk about image search in her blow below.

New technologies are emerging that will take image search a step further, however. Instead of looking at the text associated with an image, these technologies can effectively scan and “see” what the image is to provide the user with information about it.

The applications of such technology are far reaching, including copyright protection, content moderation, censorship, and forensics investigations. Today, I’ll focus on its application to search specifically. Terms used to describe these advances include “visual search technologies,” “visual cataloguing,” “image recognition,” “image identification,” and “visual content analysis.” No matter what you call them, though, these technologies essentially attempt to do the same thing: decipher the content in an image so that queries can be performed.

Why should you care about all this? I’m sure you’ve experienced one of the following scenarios:

* When you go through your photos from the previous night, you find a picture with a random person in it. You want to find out who that person is.

* You take a picture of something and later notice something cool in the background (a painting, car, gadget, etc.) and want to know where to buy it.

* You vacation abroad and snap a photo of a historic landmark. Later, you can’t remember what the landmark is called.

* You find an image that you want to publish online or in print, but the resolution is too grainy.

The new visual search technology is the solution to all these conundrums. Instead of using text to querying for an image, you can upload a particular image and run a query based on the image’s contents. This is referred to as query by image, rather than query by keyword.

For example, according to LTU Technologies, a leader in visual search technologies, you can upload an image from your computer or the Web and ask its visual cataloging product to show you:

* Images identical to your image

* Variations of the image

* Images similar to the image

* A high-resolution version of the image

The search results will include the images the engine deems to be the most closely matched to your query. If you asked for images identical to your image, the top results would be those that most closely resemble your image’s visual content, which would be followed by images that are very similar but perhaps not exact replicas of the queried image.

In addition, depending on the visual search technology, it is possible to weight queries to emphasize a specific color, shape, or both. Existing engines leveraging such technology include the progressive visual search engine TinEye and the mobile visual search engine SnapTell.

All these technologies will no doubt help searchers more easily retrieve information about existing images or find new images that meet their needs. Image searches will return more relevant results, improving the user experience and satisfaction with this technology.

Let’s consider the implications for marketers for a moment.

Moving forward, we may no longer need to emphasize keyword tagging or contextual placement of images since image analysis can interpret and understand the image without textual content. Any advertiser whose products rely on images to do the selling (e.g., fashion retailers and car manufacturers) stand to benefit from increased visibility, literally, in search engines. You may see more traffic coming to your Web site as a result of the images your site has indexed in these new image search engines.

It is unclear just how much impact these new technologies will have on individuals and businesses, but it is an important trend to be aware of for all those who use search engine marketing strategies.

Our SEO Process – It Takes Time.

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

Recently I’ve been hearing the same question come up in many conversations with clients: “When will I see results from our SEO (Search Engine Optimization) plan”? My response is the same to every client, regardless of the situation. “It depends. It could take a couple weeks or a couple of months. You have to be patient.” Our SEO process is very intricate and time consuming. That being said- it works. Below is an explanation of why SEO campaigns take some time to get off the ground, and why our SEO is more ‘process’ than ‘result’.

Receiving Links Back from High Page-rank Sites is the First Step.

First things first, securing inbound links is never a speedy process. One aspect of a typical SEO campaign will involve writing to other web directories and websites, inviting them to link to your own, which takes time. However, without this crucial step, links from other websites take MUCH longer to develop. I usually tell my clients to think of an SEO campaign as a process that speeds up what would occur naturally.

Webmaster response can also take a considerable amount of time. Even if you or your SEO consultant completed 150 requests in a day, the webmasters of those 150 other sites may not get back to you immediately. In extreme cases, it has been 10 – 12 months before I have heard back from some webmasters. So you’ll get some links quickly, and other links will take much longer.
The importance of receiving these links is that search engines count inbound links as a “vote”. Sites that have more “votes” are perceived as being stronger, in addition to having higher rankings.

Getting your Inbound Links to be Indexed

So let’s say that a few weeks have passed and you’ve secured 50 valuable inbound links from 50 great websites. Even though you’ve requested 150, you will never get every link you ask for, it just doesn’t happen. Some webmasters will never answer your request, and some simply will not link back.

So you have some links pointing to your site, now what?

Now the long and detailed process moves on to Google and Yahoo and they don’t get around to indexing those 50 pages for days or weeks. Google will generally index most sites within 3 – 4 weeks, whereas Yahoo takes longer and MSN takes much longer. As second-tier search engines like MSN improve their technology, you can expect the indexing speed to catch up. Additionally, until the search engines update their indexes of the pages that link to your site, it’s as if the link doesn’t exist.

Search engines are picky and they don’t index pages just because webmasters index them. So, if Google comes upon a web page with a link to your site, it may index that page immediately, or it may return a few times before the page is indexed. In that case, some links may take months to be indexed.

The Sites that Link to You have to wait for their Links as well

You also can’t forget that the sites that link to you are “living” websites too. The strength of their web presence is based on the links they receive – and that landscape is constantly changing. When your site is new, the sites that are willing to link to you are going to usually be new as well. As such, the inbound linking power of the sites that link to you will tend to be weaker than websites that have been around for a longer period of time. However, those sites will grow into stronger sites as they age, and then the inbound links that you have from other sites will grow as well.

The Sandbox Effect

And then, on top of everything else, there is the Sandbox Effect. The Sandbox Effect refers to the phenomenon of a temporary ranking penalty applied to newer websites that undergo rapid expansion in either inbound links or size. The Sandbox Effect is heavily debated and never conclusively proven either way.

Google spokesperson, Matt Cutts, has publicly stated, “There are some things in the algorithm that may be perceived as a sandbox that doesn’t apply to all industries.” Mr. Cutts’ statements are very well prepared, extremely rare and he is widely regarded as a knowledgeable, reliable source.
And so, the Sandbox Effect may serve to temporarily slow down the effects of any promotional campaign you undertake.

All of these factors combine to form the long and often frustrating process of a typical SEO campaign. Depending on your website, it can be a quick and pain-free experience, or it can be a slow and testing process. It depends. You have to be patient.